Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): PURIQ (September-December)
Articles

Interactive strategies in the understanding of philosophical readings of the Ayacucho university students

Adolfo Quispe Arroyo
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University
Bio
María Flores Gutiérrez
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University
Bio
Pedro Huauya Quispe
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University
Bio

Published 2020-07-20

Keywords

  • Interactive strategies,
  • understanding of philosophical readings

How to Cite

Quispe Arroyo, A., Flores Gutiérrez, M., & Huauya Quispe, P. (2020). Interactive strategies in the understanding of philosophical readings of the Ayacucho university students. Puriq, 2(3), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.2.3.93

Métricas alternativas

Abstract

The present research work was carried out with the objective of determining the influence of interactive strategies on the understanding of philosophical readings of university students from San Cristóbal de Huamanga, Ayacucho. To this end, we are guided by the positivist paradigm and its quantitative approach in quasi-experimental design. The study area was made up of university students. The sample consisted of 30 students from the Professional School of Obstetrics that made up the experimental group and 30 students from the Professional School of Nursing that made up the control group, both groups from the Faculty of Health Sciences. To compare the qualifications of the groups, a comprehension test of philosophical readings was applied. To test the hypothesis, the Wilcoxon statistical test was used. The results of the investigation determined that 70.0% of the students in the experimental group, with the application of interactive strategies, were within the good average and 30.0% were within the excellent average compared to the control group that did not reach these averages. . In conclusion, with a confidence level of 95% and a significance level of 5%, when obtaining a p value <0.05 (0.000), it is stated that the application of interactive strategies significantly influence the understanding of philosophical readings of the University students from the National University of San Cristóbal de Huamanga, Ayacucho-Peru.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Beltrán, J. (1993). Procesos, estrategias y técnicas de aprendizaje. Editorial Síntesis.
  2. Brown A. (1988) Metacognition, Executive Control, Self-regulation, and other More Mysterious.
  3. Colomer y Camps (2000) Enseñar a leer, enseñar a comprender. Celeste Ediciones/ mec.
  4. Ferreiro, E. (2014) El ingreso a la escritura y a las culturas de lo escrito. Editorial siglo XXI.
  5. Genovard, C. (1990) Psicología de la instrucción. Editorial Santillana.
  6. Jolibert, J (2000) Lo que es leer. Editorial Mc Graw-Hill.
  7. Palincsar y Brown (1997) La enseñanza para la lectura autorregulada. En L. Resnick y L.
  8. Kopfler (comps.) Curriculum y Cognición.
  9. Pozo, J. (2000) Adquisición de estrategias de aprendizaje. Cuadernos de pedagogía.
  10. Pressley, K. (1985) Tite relevance of tite goad stralegy ¿ser niodel (o lite teaching of rrmathero.alics. Educational Psycrdagíst.
  11. Ramírez, E. (2009) ¿Qué es leer? ¿Qué es la lectura? Centro Universitario de Investigaciones Bibliotecológicas de la UNAM México. eramirez@servidor.unam.mx
  12. Sánchez, M. (1993) Los textos expositivos. Estrategias para mejorar su comprensión. Editorial Santillana.
  13. Solé, I. (1999) Estrategias de lectura. Editorial Grao.