Vol. 3 No. 1 (2021): PURIQ (January-April)
Articles

Metacognition: a strategic phenomenon for teaching and learning

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))
Carlos Fernando Vélez Gutiérrez
University of Caldas
Bio
Francisco Javier Ruíz Ortega
University of Caldas
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.3.1.112

Published 2021-01-04

Keywords

  • Cognition,
  • metacognition,
  • teaching,
  • learning

How to Cite

Vélez Gutiérrez, C. F., & Ruíz Ortega, F. J. (2021). Metacognition: a strategic phenomenon for teaching and learning . Puriq, 3(1), 93–103. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.3.1.112

Copyright (c) 2021 PURIQ

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Métricas alternativas

Share
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Abstract

The discussion about metacognition, a recently characterized cognitive phenomenon, indispensable in education processes and problem-solving, falls within two particular fields of knowledge, i.e., evolutionary psychology and information processing. From these fields come the theoretical perspectives that emphasize phenomena such as the theory of the mind, the evolution of intelligence, the sense of knowledge, understanding, knowledge, and regulation. As conclusions, for the teacher, we emphasize the importance of raising awareness about students' mental processing manners as a possibility to adapt teaching strategies, an essential requirement to ensure that learning and development occur and that the student engages more effectively.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Acosta, D.A., Vasco, C.E. (2013). Habilidades, competencias y experticias: más allá del saber qué y el saber cómo. Bogotá: Unitec, CINDE, Universidad de Manizales.
  2. Baker, L. (1989). Metacognition, Comprehension Monitoring and the Adult Reader. Educational Psychology Review, 1(1), 3-38.
  3. Baker, L. & Brown, A. L. (1984). Cognitive monitoring in Reading. In Flood, J. (Eds.) Understanding Reading Comprehension: Cognition, Language and the Structure of Prose. Delaware: I.R.A. (pp. 21-43).
  4. Briñol, P. y DeMarree, K. G. (2012). Social Metacognition. New York: Psychology Press Taylor & Francis Group.
  5. Bueno, D. (2017). Neurociencia para educadores. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  6. Campo, K., Escorcia, D., Moreno, M. & Palacio, J. (2016). Metacognición, escritura y rendimiento académico en universitarios de Colombia y Francia. Avances en Psicología Latinoamericana, 34(2), 233-252.
  7. Chekwa, E., McFadden, M., Divine, A. & Dorius, T. (2015). Metacognition: Transforming the Learning Experience. Journal of Learning in Higher Education, 11(1), 109-112.
  8. Chi, M. (1987). Representing knowledge and metaknowledge: implications for interpreting metamemory research. In Weinert, F. y Klowe, R. (Eds.). Metacognition, Motivation and Understanding. Broadway: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. (pp. 239-264).
  9. Crespo, N. M. (2000). La Metacognición: Las diferentes vertientes de una Teoría. Revista Signos, 33(48), 97-115.
  10. Damasio, A. (1999). El error de Descartes. La emoción, la razón y el cerebro humano. Santiago de Chile: Crítica – Editorial Andres Bello.
  11. Duman, B. (2006). The effect of brain-based instruction to improve on students’ academic achievement in social studies instruction. 9. International Conference On Engineering Education San Juan, Puerto Rico July 23-28. ICEE-2006.
  12. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognitive and Cognitive Monitoring: A New Area of Cognitive-Developmental Inquiry. American Psychologyst, 34, 906-911.
  13. Flavell, J.H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. Weinert, & R. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation and understanding (pp. 21–29). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  14. Flavell, J. H. (2004). Theory-of-Mind Development: Retrospect and Prospect. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 50(3), 274–290.
  15. Frith, C. D. and Frith, U. (1999). Interacting Minds - A Biological Basis. Cognitive Psychology, 286 (26) November.
  16. Frith, C. D. (2012). The role of metacognition in human social interactions. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 367, 2213-2223.
  17. Goos, M.; Galbraith, P.; and Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49, 193–223. ?
  18. Hertzog, C., & Dixon, R. (1994). Metacognitive development in adulthood and old age. In J. Metcalfe & A. Shimamura (Eds.), Metacognition: Knowing about knowing (pp. 227 – 251). Cambridge, MA: Bradford.
  19. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Auto-organización y cambio cognitivo. Substratum, 1(1), 19-43.
  20. Perner, J. (1994). Comprender la mente representacional. Barcelona: Paidós Ibérica
  21. Piaget, J. (1985). La toma de conciencia. Madrid: Ediciones Morata S.A. (Tercera edición).
  22. Piaget, J. (2000). La equilibración de las estructuras cognitivas. Problema central del desarrollo. México: Siglo XXI Editores. (Sexta edición en español).
  23. Ramakrishnan, J. & Annakodi, R. (2013). Brain based learning strategies. International Journal of Innovative Research and Studies (IJIRS), 2(5), 235-242.
  24. Schraw, G. and Moshman, D. (1995). Metacognitive Theories. Educational Psychology Review, 7(4).
  25. Shea, N., Boldt, A., Bang, D., Yeung, N., Heyes, C. and Frith, C. D. (2014). Supra-personal cognitive control and metacognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18(4).
  26. Schwartz, D. L., Chase, C., Chin, D. B., Oppezzo, M., Kwong, H., Okita, S., Biswas, G., Roscoe, R., Jeong, H., and Wagster J. (2009). Interactive Metacognition: Monitoring and regulating a teachable Agent. In: Handbook of metacognition in education. New York: Routledge.
  27. Tomasello, M. (2003). The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
  28. Tullis, J. G. and Fraundorf, S. H. (2017). Predicting others’ memory performance: The accuracy and bases of social metacognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 95(1), 124-137.
  29. Van De Bogart, K.L.; Dounas-Frazer, D.R.; Lewandowski, H.J. and Stetzer, M.R.?(2017). Investigating the role of socially mediated metacognition during collaborative troubleshooting of electric circuits. Physical Review Physics Education Research,13(2).
  30. Vygotsky, L. (2000). El desarrollo de los procesos psicológicos superiores. Barcelona: Crítica. Primera edición en Biblioteca de Bolsillo.
  31. Wellman, H. M. A. (1985). The Origins of Metacognition. En Forrest Presley, D. L., Mackinton, G. E. and Waller, T.G. (Eds.) Metacognition, cognition and Human Perfomance, Orlando: Academic Press (pp.1-30).
  32. Wilson, N.S., Bai, H. (2010). The relationships and impact of teachers’ metacognitive knowledge and pedagogical understandings?of metacognition. Metacognition Learning 5, 269–288
  33. Zohar A. & Barzilai, S. (2013) A review of research on metacognition in science education: current and future directions. Studies in Science Education, 49(2), 121-169.