Vol. 2 No. 3 (2020): PURIQ (September-December)
Articles

Characterization and Opportunities for the Improvement of Solid Waste at the educational institution, La Esperanza (Trujillo-Peru), 2019

Bilmia Veneros Urbina
Cesar Vallejo University
Bio
Paolo Amaya Alvarado
Cesar Vallejo University
Bio
Yaneth Aracelli Chuan Torres
Cesar Vallejo University
Bio
Cristhian Manchay Hernández
Cesar Vallejo University
Bio

Published 2020-07-24

Keywords

  • Characterization,
  • improvement opportunities,
  • solid waste

How to Cite

Veneros Urbina, B., Amaya Alvarado, P., Chuan Torres , Y. A. ., & Manchay Hernández, C. (2020). Characterization and Opportunities for the Improvement of Solid Waste at the educational institution, La Esperanza (Trujillo-Peru), 2019. Puriq, 2(3), 222–232. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.2.3.96

Métricas alternativas

Abstract

The purpose of the research was to determine the characterization and opportunities for improvement of solid waste at the educational institution. The research is non-experimental, presented a transversal and descriptive design. The population and sample consisted of the waste generated by the students, teaching and administrative staff of the San José educational institution of the district of La Esperanza, province of Trujillo, region La Libertad, which represent a total of 1551 people. The measurement and characterization of waste was carried out taking into account the guide for the characterization of household solid waste, formulated by Kunitoshi Sakurai (1982). The opportunities for improvement were developed through a focus group and brain storning where the members of the educational community participated, and then be shown through a double entry matrix. The characterization of solid waste was determined and improvement opportunities were established that contribute to an adequate solid waste management of the educational institution, La Esperanza - La Libertad region. Solid waste was characterized, the solid residue with the highest percentage being paper with 25.56%, plastic with 16. 33% and fruit remains with 15.69%, while residues with a lower percentage such as metals with 2.08%, cardboardwith 5.26% and wood with 5.26%. Per capita production shows that each person can generate solid waste at a value of 65 grams for each member of the educational community. A matrix was developed where there are opportunities for improvement to reduce and properly manage solid waste generated in the EI “San José, La Esperanza - La Libertad region, highlighting, the environmental management policy, implementation of a composting plant, program of training and recycling, for this purpose, responsible and established times were determined.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2010). Australian waste wise schools program: its past, present, and future. Journal of Environmental Education, 41, 165–178.
  2. Collazos, H. (1997). Residuos Sólidos. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional.
  3. Ley Nº 27314. (2000). Ley General de Residuos Sólidos Modificada por D.S Nº 1065. Ministerio del Ambiente.
  4. Kandil, S. H., Abou Bakr, H., & Mortensen, L. (2004). Incorporating Environmental Awareness of Solid Waste Management Within the Education System: (A Case From Egypt). Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 43(6), 1795–1803.
  5. Kayihan, K. S., & Tönük, S. (2012). A study of litter and waste management policies at (primary) eco-schools in Istanbul. Waste Management & Research, 30(1), 80– 88.
  6. Louis, G. E. (2004). A Historical Context of Municipal Solid Waste Management in the United States. Waste Management & Research, 22(4), 306–322.
  7. Marshall & Farahbakhsh. (2013). Enfoques de sistemas para la gestión integrada de residuos sólidos en países en desarrollo.
  8. Melosi, M. V. (2005). Garbage in the cities: refuse, reform, and the environment. Pittsburgh, Pa.: University of Pittsburgh Press
  9. Ministerio del Ambiente. (2015). Guía metodológica para el desarrollo del Plan de Manejo de Residuos Sólidos. Ministerio del Ambiente, Perú.
  10. Ministerio del Ambiente. (2016). Plan nacional de gestión integral de residuos sólidos 2016-2024.
  11. MINEDU. (2019). Ministerio de Educación Manejo de residuos sólidos en la Instituciones Educativas.
  12. MUNICIPALIDAD DISTRITAL DE ATE. (2011). Estudio de caracterización física de residuos sólidos no domiciliarios del distrito de Ate. Página 64.
  13. MUNICIPALIDAD DISTRITAL DE LOS OLIVOS. (2015). Plan distrital de manejo y gestión de residuos sólidos del distrito de los olivos.
  14. MUNICIPALIDAD DISTRITAL DEL RIMAC. (2013). Plan de manejo de residuos sólidos del Rímac. Pagina (14).
  15. Ortiz, O., Pasqualino, J., Díez, G., & Castells, F. (2010). The environmental impact of the construction phase: An application to composite walls from a life cycle perspective. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 54(11):832-840.
  16. Pineda, S. (1998). MANEJO Y DISPOSICION DE RESIDUOS SOLIDOS URBANOS. LIME-Acodal.
  17. Quintero, B., Teutli, M., González, M., Ruiz, A., Jiménez, G. (2003) "Manejo de residuos sólidos en Instituciones Educativas". México.
  18. Sales, M., Delerue-Matos, C., Martins, I., Serra, I., Silva, M., & Morais, S. (2006). A waste management school appr oach towards sustainability. Resources consevation and recycling, 48, 197–207.
  19. Seadon, J. K. (2006). Integrated waste management – Looking beyond the solid waste horizon. Waste Management, 26(12), 1327–1336.
  20. SINIA. (2013). Generación per cápita de residuos sólidos. Ministerio del Ambiente: Biblioteca nacional del Perú.
  21. Tchobanoglous, G. (1994).Gestión integral de residuos sólidos. Madrid: McGraw-Hill
  22. Vértice, P. (2008). Gestión medioambiental: manipulación de residuos y productos químicos. Málaga.
  23. Worrell, W. A., & Vesilind, P. A. (2012). Solid waste engineering. Australia; Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.