v. 6 (2024): Janeiro-Dezembro: publicação contínua
Artigo original

Impacto da Inteligência Artificial no Desempenho Acadêmico de Estudantes do Ensino Médio: Estudo Correlacional

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))
Carlos Eduardo Cobos-Gutierrez
Escuela Nacional Superior de Ballet
Biografia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.6.740

Publicado 2024-12-10

Palavras-chave

  • inteligência artificial,
  • desempenho acadêmico,
  • ferramentas educacionais,
  • estudantes do ensino médio,
  • acesso à tecnologia

Como Citar

Cobos-Gutierrez, C. E. (2024). Impacto da Inteligência Artificial no Desempenho Acadêmico de Estudantes do Ensino Médio: Estudo Correlacional. Puriq, 6, e740. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.6.740

Copyright (c) 2024 Carlos Eduardo Cobos-Gutierrez

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Métricas alternativas

Share
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Resumo

Este estudo explorou a relação entre o uso de ferramentas de Inteligência Artificial (IA) e o desempenho acadêmico de estudantes do ensino médio por meio de uma abordagem correlacional. Foram analisados 350 estudantes de diferentes contextos socioeconômicos para avaliar o impacto da IA em disciplinas chave, como matemática, ciências e humanidades. Os resultados mostraram uma melhoria significativa nas notas dos alunos, especialmente aqueles que usaram ferramentas de IA com mais frequência. Além disso, foi identificado que o acesso a dispositivos tecnológicos e a frequência de uso de IA influenciaram diretamente os resultados acadêmicos. Este estudo sugere que a IA é uma ferramenta eficaz para melhorar a aprendizagem, embora seja necessário garantir o acesso equitativo à tecnologia.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. Banholzer, N., Jent, P., Bittel, P., Zürcher, K., Furrer, L., Bertschinger, S., Weingartner, E., Ramette, A., Egger, M., Hascher, T., & Fenner, L. (2024). Air cleaners and respiratory infections in schools: A modeling study using epidemiological, environmental, and molecular data. Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofae169
  2. Braga, B. C., Nguyen, P. H., Tran, L. M., Hoang, N. T., Bannerman, B., Doyle, F., Folson, G., Gangupantulu, R., Karachiwalla, N., Kolt, B., McCloskey, P., Palloni, G., Tran, T. H. T., Tro'u'ng, D. T. T., Hughes, D., & Gelli, A. (2024). Feasibility of using an artificial intelligence-based telephone application for dietary assessment and nudging to improve the quality of food choices of female adolescents in Vietnam: Evidence from a randomized pilot study. Current Developments in Nutrition, 8(6), 102063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cdnut.2023.102063
  3. Chu, L., Liu, Y., Zhai, Y., Wang, D., & Wu, Y. (2024). The use of deep learning integrating image recognition in language analysis technology in secondary school education. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-52592-5
  4. Destéfano, M., Trifonova, A., & Barajas, M. (2024). Teaching AI to the next generation: A humanistic approach. Digital Education Review, 45, 115–123. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2024.45.115-123
  5. Egara, F. O., & Mosimege, M. (2024). Exploring the integration of artificial intelligence-based ChatGPT into mathematics instruction: Perceptions, challenges, and implications for educators. Education Sciences, 14(7), 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14070742
  6. Falloon, G. (2024). Advancing young students’ computational thinking: An investigation of structured curriculum in early years primary schooling. Computers & Education, 216, 105045. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105045
  7. Fundi, M., Sanusi, I. T., Oyelere, S. S., & Ayere, M. (2024). Advancing AI education: Assessing Kenyan in-service teachers’ preparedness for integrating artificial intelligence in competence-based curriculum. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 14, 100412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2024.100412
  8. Jeon, I., Kim, S., & Kang, S. (2024). Developing standards for educational datasets by school level: A framework for sustainable K-12 education. Sustainability, 16(12), 4954. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16124954
  9. Khasawneh, M. a. S. (2024). Teacher opinions on the role of educational robots in enhancing programming skills among hearing-impaired students. International Journal of Learning Teaching and Educational Research, 23(5), 309–322. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.5.16
  10. Kindenberg, B. (2024). ChatGPT-generated and student-written historical narratives: A comparative analysis. Education Sciences, 14(5), 530. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci14050530
  11. Lawrence, L., Echeverria, V., Yang, K., Aleven, V., & Rummel, N. (2023). How teachers conceptualise shared control with an AI co-orchestration tool: A multiyear teacher-centred design process. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 823–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13372
  12. Lee, V. R., Pope, D., Miles, S., & Zárate, R. C. (2024). Cheating in the age of generative AI: A high school survey study of cheating behaviors before and after the release of ChatGPT. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100253
  13. Ng, D. T. K., Wu, W., Leung, J. K. L., Chiu, T. K. F., & Chu, S. K. W. (2023). Design and validation of the AI literacy questionnaire: The affective, behavioural, cognitive and ethical approach. British Journal of Educational Technology, 55(3), 1082–1104. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.13411
  14. Picciano, A. G. (2024). Graduate teacher education students use and evaluate ChatGPT as an essay-writing tool. Online Learning, 28(2). https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v28i2.4373
  15. Sikstrom, P., Valentini, C., Sivunen, A., & Karkkainen, T. (2024). Pedagogical agents communicating and scaffolding students’ learning: High school teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Computers & Education, 222, 105140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2024.105140
  16. Simeunovic, M., & Ruzicic, V. (2024). Overview and implementation of artificial intelligence in the improvement of educational process. Journal of Scientific & Industrial Research, 83(5). https://doi.org/10.56042/jsir.v83i5.3192
  17. Siyao, L., Ya, W., & Yingfeng, L. (2024). How can industrial intelligence change the employment structure of the floating population? PLoS ONE, 19(5), e0297266. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297266
  18. Sperling, K., Stenliden, L., Nissen, J., & Heintz, F. (2024). Behind the scenes of co-designing AI and LA in K-12 education. Postdigital Science and Education, 6(2), 321–341. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-023-00417-5
  19. Yuldashevna, I. A., & Khurana, K. (2024). The impediments to the process of implementing robotics in the school education system in Uzbekistan. SAGE Open, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440241254595
  20. Zheng, S. (2024). The effects of chatbot use on foreign language reading anxiety and reading performance among Chinese secondary school students. Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence, 7, 100271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeai.2024.100271