Linguistic-cognitive analysis of discourse from cognitive grammar
Published 2021-05-05
Keywords
- Cognitive grammar,
- covid-19 pandemic,
- cognitive linguistics,
- syntactic analysis
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2021 Edward Faustino Loayza Maturrano
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Métricas alternativas
Abstract
This article proposes through the theoretical position of a branch of cognitivism: cognitive grammar, the cognitive strategy that the human being executes when using the language. The objective of the study is to logically graph the cognitive processes in the function of thinking-meaning, of expressing oneself linguistically. The application of the cognitive strategy of the use of language is made effective in the linguistic pragmatics of the sociolect of the Sars CoV-2 pandemic. The research methodology is qualitative of the discourse analysis type. The results show the cognitive nature of linguistic innovations and show the executive process in the thinking-meaning of the statements. The main conclusion is that the linguistic-cognitive analysis of the proposed discourse graphs and shows the cognitive condition of the language. It is recommended to apply the analysis model in the interpretation of various speeches.
Downloads
References
- Bolognesi, M. y Vernillo, P. (2019). How abstract concepts emerge from metaphorical images: The metonymic way. Language & Communication, 69, 26-41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2019.05.003
- Croft, W. (2001). Radical Construction Grammar; syntactic theory in typological perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Fauconnier, G. (1994). Mental Spaces. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Fauconnier, G. y Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science. Vol. 22 (2), April-June, (Expanded web version, 10 February 2001), 133-187. Recuperado de: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=1058129
- Fauconnier, G. y Turner, M. (2008). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind's hidden complexities. New York: Basic Books.
- Ferrari, L. (2011). Introdução à Linguística Cognitiva. São Paulo: Contexto.
- Grice, H. (1975). Logic and conversation. En Peter Cole & Jerry Morgan (ed.). Sintax and Semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58.
- Kövecses, Z. (2010). Metaphor: a practical introduction. 2da. ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010a.
- Kövecses, Z. (2017). Levels of metaphor. Cognitive linguistics, Vol. 28 (2), 321-347. https://doi.org/10.1515/cog-2016-0052
- Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
- Lakoff, G. y Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
- Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar: Theoretical prerequisites. Stanford University Press.
- Langacker, R. W., y Langacker, R. (2008). Cognitive grammar: A basic introduction. OUP USA.
- Llopis, R. (2011). Gramática cognitiva para la enseñanza del español como lengua extranjera: Un estudio con aprendientes alemanes de español como lengua extranjera. Madrid. MEC. Recuperado de: http://www.cervantesvirtual.com/nd/ark:/59851/bmcwd5x6
- Loayza, E. (2006). Investigación cualitativa en Educación. Investigación educativa, 10 (18), 75-85. Recuperado de: https://revistasinvestigacion.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/educa/article/view/3778
- Loayza, E. (2010). La educación y el habla folklórica: análisis y propuesta. Lengua y Sociedad, 10(1), 133-147. Recuperado de: https://www.aacademica.org/edward.faustino.loayza.maturrano/9.pdf
- Loayza, E. (2011). Análisis pragmático del código oral del transporte público urbano (‘lenguaje combi ’) en Lima Metropolitana. Lengua y Sociedad, 11(1), 91-100. Recuperado de: http://revista.letras.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/ls/article/view/415
- Loayza, E. (2013). Análisis pragmático de la jerga técnica de los estudiantes de Unalm. Lengua y Sociedad, 13(1), 155-167. Recuperado de: http://revista.letras.unmsm.edu.pe/index.php/ls/article/view/445
- Loayza Maturrano, E. (2020a). Semiótica del discurso docente-discente en la educación remota. Una evaluación semiótico-formativa en tiempos de COVID-19. Hacedor. Vol. 4 (2), 44-59. https://doi.org/10.26495/rch.v4i2.1489
- Loayza Maturrano, E. (2020b). Análisis semiótico del lexicón de la comida peruana amazónica. ConCiencia EPG, 5(2), 90 - 109. https://doi.org/10.32654/CONCIENCIAEPG.5-2.6
- Loayza Maturrano, E. (2020c). La investigación cualitativa en Ciencias Humanas y Educación. Criterios para elaborar artículos científicos. Educare et Comunicare, 8 (2), 56-66. https://doi.org/10.35383/educare.v8i2.536
- Nuyts, J. (1993). Cognitive linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics, 20 (3), 269-290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-2166(93)90050-Y
- Rosch, E. (1973). On the internal structure of perceptual and semantic categories. En Moore, T. (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language. New York: Academic Press, 111-44.
- Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. En Rosch, E. e Lloyd, B. (eds.), Cognition and Categorization, Hillsdale, NJ; NY: Lawrence Erlbaum, 27-48.
- Ruiz de Mendoza, F. (2000). El modelo cognitivo idealizado de tamaño y la formación de aumentativos y diminutivos en español. Revista española de Lingüística Aplicada. Vol. Extra 1, 355-374. https://doi.org/10.35383/educare.v8i2.536