Vol. 4 (2022): january-december: continuous publication
Original article

Inferential reading of the “cynical” subversive attitudes in the Education students of San Cristóbal de Huamanga

Adolfo Quispe-Arroyo
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University
Bio
Pedro Huauya-Quispe
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University
Bio
Edison Laderas-Huillcahuari
San Cristóbal of Huamanga University
Bio

Published 2021-01-05

Keywords

  • Inferential reading,
  • cynicism,
  • subversive attitude

How to Cite

Quispe-Arroyo, A., Huauya-Quispe, P., & Laderas-Huillcahuari, E. (2021). Inferential reading of the “cynical” subversive attitudes in the Education students of San Cristóbal de Huamanga. Puriq, 4, e197. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.4.1.197

Métricas alternativas

Abstract

The present research work entitled: inferential reading of “cynical” subversive attitudes in education students, was developed with the aim of interpreting “cynical” subversive attitudes through the inferential reading of university students in education. In this sense, a descriptive study was carried out to analyze and describe the results of the inferential reading referred to the subversive attitudes of the cynics, whose space corresponded to the Faculty of Education Sciences of the San Cristóbal de Huamanga University. The students in the sample were 12 members of the specialty of Social Sciences and Philosophy of the 200 series. According to the interpretation of the instrument range by the scores obtained, it is concluded that of the 12 (100%) students evaluated 07 (58.3 %) recognize the subversive attitudes of the cynics and 05 (41.7%) do not recognize the subversive attitudes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Bloom, B. S. (1984) The 2-sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher.
  2. Cooper, J.D (1990) Cómo mejorar la comprensión lectora. Visor – MEC, Madrid.
  3. Díaz B., F. y Hernández R., G. (1999) Estrategias docentes para un aprendizaje significativo. Edit. Mc Graw-Hill, México.
  4. Jolibert & Jacob (1998) Lo que es leer. Edit. Mc Graw-Hill, México.
  5. Goodman, K.S. (1967) Reading: a psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist.
  6. Laercio, D. (2002) Vidas de filósofos ilustres. Edit. Omega, Barcelona.
  7. Onfray, M. (2005) Cinismos: retrato de los filósofos llamados perros. Ed. Paidós, Barcelona.
  8. Pinzás, J. (2006) Comprensión lectora. FIMART, Lima.
  9. Pueblos Unidos (1965) Diccionario soviético de filosofía. Edic. Pueblos unidos, Montevideo.
  10. Weaver (1994) Aspectos de la comprensión literaria. Universidad de Baylor.