Vol. 6 (2024): january-december: continuous publication
Artículo de Revisión

El epifenomenismo y la filosofía de Schopenhauer

Giancarlo Anselmo Rivera
Roma Tre University
Bio

Published 2024-04-22

Keywords

  • Epiphenomenalism,
  • idealism,
  • will,
  • Schopenhauer

How to Cite

Rivera, G. A. (2024). El epifenomenismo y la filosofía de Schopenhauer. Puriq, 6, e558. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.6.558

Métricas alternativas

Abstract

This article offers an introductory exposition on the relationship between the philosophical thesis of epiphenomenalism and Schopenhauer's philosophy regarding the problem of the mind-body relationship. The most important notions are presented in a summarized manner, which allows the general reader to have an approach towards understanding this problem. On the one hand, contemporary authors who address epiphenomenalism have been considered; on the other hand, to obtain a general vision of Schopenhauer's philosophy and relate it to the topic, the most important concepts from his works have been selected. The examination of these contents allows us to establish a relationship between both proposals and, in turn, invites us to reflect on the possible preponderance of the biological component over reason.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Abbagnano, N. (1974). Diccionario de Filosofía. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  2. Altman, M. (2014). The Palgrave Handbook of German Idealism. Palgrave Macmillan.
  3. Beiser, F. (2020). Romanticism and Pessimism. En E. Millán (Ed.), The Palgrave Handbook of German Romantic Philosophy (Palgrave Handbooks in German Idealism) (pp. 573-585). Palgrave Macmillan.
  4. Bowie, A. (2009). Romantic philosophy and religion. En N. Saul (Ed.), The Cambridge Companion to German Romanticism (Cambridge Companions to Literature) (pp. 175-190). Cambridge University Press.
  5. Cassirer, E. (1955). Storia della filosofia Moderna III. Il problema della conoscenza nei sistemi postkantiani (Trad. it. E. Arnaud). Einaudi.
  6. Di Francesco, M., Marraffa & M., Tomasetta, A. (2017). Filosofia della mente. Carocci.
  7. Grigenti, F. (2000). Natura e rappresentazione: Genesi e struttura della natura in Arthur Schopenhauer. La Città del Sole.
  8. Robb, D., Heil, J., & Gibb, S., Mental Causation. En E. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/mental-causation/>.
  9. Robinson, W. (2023). Epiphenomenalism. En E. Zalta & U. Nodelman (Eds.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Spring, URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/epiphenomenalism/>.
  10. Schopenhauer, A. (2009a). El mundo como voluntad y representación I (Trad. P. López de Santa María). Trotta. (Trabajo original publicado ca. 1819).
  11. Schopenhauer, A. (2009b). El mundo como voluntad y representación II (Trad. P. López de Santa María). Trotta. (Trabajo original publicado ca. 1844).
  12. Schopenhauer, A. (2013). Sobre la visión y los colores (Trad. P. López de Santa María). Trotta. (Trabajo original publicado ca. 1854).
  13. Schopenhauer, A. (2019). Sobre la cuádruple raíz del principio de razón suficiente (Trad. P. López de Santa María). Alianza Editorial. (Trabajo original publicado ca. 1847).
  14. Schopenhauer, A. (2023). Parerga y paralipómena I (Trad. P. López de Santa María). Trotta. (Trabajo original publicado ca. 1851)
  15. Wegner, D. (2019). L’illusione della volontà cosciente (Trad. it. A. Lavazza). En M. De Caro, A. Lavazza & G. Sartori (Eds.), Siamo davvero liberi? (pp. 21-49). Codice.