v. 4 (2022): Janeiro-Dezembro: publicação contínua
Artigo original

Experiência educacional na virtualidade. Percepções de futuros instrutores sobre uma agência em construção

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))
INFORME DE REVISIÓN (Español (España))
Daiana Yamila Rigo
National University of Río Cuarto
Biografia
Guadalupe Guarido
National University of Río Cuarto
Biografia
Stefania Amaya
National University of Río Cuarto
Biografia
Lucía Llanes
National University of Río Cuarto
Biografia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.4.361

Publicado 2022-08-13

Palavras-chave

  • Agência colaborativa e projetiva,
  • engajamento,
  • formação de professores,
  • virtualidade

Como Citar

Rigo, D. Y., Guarido, G., Amaya, S., & Llanes, L. (2022). Experiência educacional na virtualidade. Percepções de futuros instrutores sobre uma agência em construção. Puriq, 4, e361. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.4.361

Copyright (c) 2022 Daiana Yamila Rigo, Guadalupe Guarido, Stefania Amaya, Lucia Llanes

Creative Commons License
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Métricas alternativas

Share
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC

Resumo

O objetivo desta pesquisa foi estudar as percepções sobre o desenvolvimento da agência de um grupo de estudantes universitários através de uma experiência educacional mediada pelas Tecnologias de Informação e Comunicação no contexto de um programa de treinamento de professores. O estudo foi enquadrado em um desenho qualitativo interpretativo, com a participação de 44 matérias inscritas em vários programas de treinamento de professores na UNRC, Argentina. Foram usadas entrevistas em grupo para coleta de dados, analisadas com ATLAS.ti. As categorias emergentes mostram uma agência que é definida como interativa e contextual, que é construída, juntamente com outras, diante dos desafios que surgem em situações educacionais reais e incertas. Desta forma, as experiências atravessadas pelas tecnologias digitais permitem que os estudantes implementem diversas ações e comportamentos. Os resultados nos permitem repensar as práticas educacionais que são enquadradas dentro de ambientes institucionais, para oferecer espaços genuínos de discussão e intercâmbio entre disciplinas para gerar rupturas nas práticas rotineiras, a fim de integrar novos recursos digitais na formação de futuros professores.

PDF (Español (España)) HTML (Español (España)) XML (Español (España)) EPUB (Español (España))
INFORME DE REVISIÓN (Español (España))

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

  1. Albion P. R., & Tondeur J. (2018) Information and Communication Technology and Education: Meaningful Change through Teacher Agency. In Voogt J., Knezek G., Christensen R. & Lai K. W. (eds) Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education (pp. 381-396). Springer International Handbooks of Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-53803-7_25-1
  2. Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist, 44(9), 1175-1184. http://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/Bandura1989AP.pdf
  3. Bandura, A. (2001). Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective. Annu. Rev. Psychol., 52, 1-26. www.annualreviews.org
  4. Bandura, A. (2006). Toward a psychology of human agency. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 164-180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00011.x
  5. Benesch, S. (2018). Emotions as agency: Feeling rules, emotion labor, and English language teachers’ decision-making. System, 79, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2018.03.015
  6. Birgin, A. (2020). Emergencia y pedagogía: la cuarentena en los institutos de formación docente. En Dusell, I., Ferrante, P., Pulfer, D. (Comp.). Pensar la educación en tiempos de pandemia: entre la emergencia, el compromiso y la espera (pp. 189-200). Buenos Aires: UNIPE: Editorial Universitaria.
  7. Cannellotto, A. (2020). Universidades viralizadas: la formación en y post pandemia, en Pensar la educación en tiempos de pandemia. En Dusell, I., Ferrante, P., Pulfer, D. (Comp.). Pensar la educación en tiempos de pandemia: entre la emergencia, el compromiso y la espera (pp. 2013-228). Buenos Aires: UNIPE: Editorial Universitaria.
  8. Coma, L (2013). Dinamizar y digitalizar la ciudad: itinerarios urbanos, dispositivos, móviles y códigos QR. Her&Mus. Heritage & Museography, 13, 63-68.
  9. Edwards, A. & D’Arcy, C. (2004). Relational agency and disposition in sociocultural accounts of learning to teach. Educational Review, 56(2), 147-155. https://doi.org/10.1080/0031910410001693236
  10. Edwards, A. (2005). Relational agency: Learning to be a resourceful practitioner. International Journal of Educational Research, 43 (3), 168-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2006.06.010
  11. Ehren, M.C.M., Madrid, R., Romiti, S., Armstrong, P. W., Fisher, P., & McWhorter, D. L. (2021). Teaching in the COVID-19 era: Understanding the opportunities and barriersfor teacher agency. Perspectives in Education, 39(1), 61-76. https://doi.org/10.18820/2519593X/pie.v39.i1.5
  12. Emirbayer, M. and Mische, A. (1998). “What is agency?” American Journal of Sociology 103(4), 962-1023. https://doi.org/10.1086/231294
  13. Engle, R. & Faux, Ro. (2006). Towards Productive Disciplinary Engagement of Prospective Teachers in Educational Psychology: Comparing Two Methods of Case-based Instruction. Teaching Educational Psychology, 1(2), 1-22.
  14. Erickson, F. (1989). Métodos cualitativos de investigación sobre la enseñanza. En M. Wittrok (Ed.), La investigación de la enseñanza II. Métodos cualitativos de observación (pp. 203-47). Barcelona: Paidós MEC.
  15. Eteläpelto, A., Vähäsantanen, K., Hökkä, P., & Paloniemi, S. (2013). What is agency? Conceptualizing professional agency at work. Educational Research Review, 10, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2013.05.001
  16. Goriss-Hunter, A., Sellings, P. & Echter, A. (2021). Information Communication Technology in schools: Students Exercise ‘Digital Agency’ to Engage with Learning. Tech Know Learn. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-021-09509-2
  17. Greeno, J. (2006) Authoritative, Accountable Positioning and Connected, General Knowing: Progressive Themes in Understanding Transfer. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 15(4), 537-547, https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327809jls1504_4
  18. Insulander, E., Brehmer, D. & Ryve, A. (2019). Teacher agency in professional development programmes – A case study of professional development material and collegial discussion. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 23, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2019.100330
  19. Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Häkkinen, P., Vasalampi, K., Rasku-Puttonen, H., & Tolvanen, A. (2020). Students’ agency profiles in relation to student-perceived teaching practices in university courses. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, Art. 101604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101604
  20. Jääskelä, P., Poikkeus, A.-M., Vasalampi, K., Valleala, U. M., & Rasku-Puttonen, H. (2017). Assessing agency of university students: validation of the AUS Scale. Studies in Higher Education, 42(11), 2061-2079. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2015.1130693
  21. Kajamaa, A. & Kumpulainen, K. (2019) Young people, digital mediation, and transformative agency, special issue (part 2). Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(4), 286-290. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1690000
  22. Lemos, M. (2017). Collaborative agency in educational management: a joint object for school and community transformation. Revista de Administração de Empresas, 57(6), 555–566. https://doi.org/10.1590/s0034-759020170604
  23. Lipponen, L., & Kumpulainen, K. (2011). Acting as accountable authors: Creating interactional spaces for agency work in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(5), 812–819. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.01.001
  24. Lonardi, E. (2007). Cómo afectan las emociones en la toma de decisión en las empresas Pymes: estudio de caso, heladerías Persicco, Buenos Aires: Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Ciencias Económicas. Escuela de Estudios de Posgrado. Disponible en http://bibliotecadigital.econ.uba.ar/download/tpos/1502-0226_LonardiE.pdf
  25. Maggio, M. (2020). Prácticas educativas reinventadas: orientar a los docentes en la irrupción de nuevas formas de enseñanza en contextos de emergencia. UNICEF: Buenos Aires. Disponible en https://www.unicef.org/argentina/sites/unicef.org.argentina/files/2020-06/EDU-equipos-conduccion-Covid-5.pdf
  26. Marcelo, C. & Vaillant, D. (2018). La formación inicial docente: problemas complejos respuestas disruptivas. Cuadernos de Pedagogia, 27, 489-2018.
  27. Miettinen, R. (2010). Creative encounters and the emergence of object-oriented collaborative agency. Lisbon, Portugal: European Group of Organizational Studies
  28. Mirete, A. (2010). Formación docente en TICS. ¿están los docentes preparados para la (r)evolución TIC? International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology, 4(1), 35-44. Disponible en https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=349832327003
  29. Narodowski, M. & Campetella, D. (2020). Educación y destrucción creativa en el capitalismo de pospandemia. En Dusell, I., Ferrante, P., Pulfer, D. (Comp.). Pensar la educación en tiempos de pandemia: entre la emergencia, el compromiso y la espera (pp. 43-51). Buenos Aires: UNIPE: Editorial Universitaria.
  30. OECD (2018). The future of education and skills Education 2030. Disponible en https://www.oecd.org/education/2030/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf
  31. Passey, D., Shonfeld, M., Appleby, L., Judge, M., Saito, T., & Smits, A. (2018). Digital Agency: Empowering Equity in and through Education. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 23(3), 425–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9384-x
  32. Pereyra, A. (2020). Viejas y nuevas desigualdades educativas. Desafíos emergentes a la formación docente. En Dusell, I., Ferrante, P., Pulfer, D. (Comp.). Pensar la educación en tiempos de pandemia: entre la emergencia, el compromiso y la espera (pp. 125-136). Buenos Aires: UNIPE: Editorial Universitaria.
  33. Philpott, C. & Oates, C. (2017) Professional Learning Communities as drivers of educationalchange: the case of Learning Rounds. Journal of Educational Change, 18 (2), 209-234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9278-4
  34. Pineau, P. & Ayuso, M. L. (2020). De saneamientos, trancazos, bolsitas de alcanfor y continuidades educativas: brotes, pestes, epidemias y pandemias en la historia de la escuela argentina. En Dusell, I., Ferrante, P., Pulfer, D. (Comp.). Pensar la educación en tiempos de pandemia: entre la emergencia, el compromiso y la espera (pp. 19-29). Buenos Aires: UNIPE, Editorial Universitaria.
  35. Reeve, J. y Shin, S. (2020) How teachers can support students’ agentic engagement. Theory into Practice, 59(2), 150-161. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1702451
  36. Rezende da Cunha Júnior, F., Kruistum, C. V., Kontopodis, M., & Oers, B. V. (2019). Students on Facebook: from observers to collaborative agents. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 26(4), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10749039.2019.1690520
  37. Rigo, D. & Squillari, R. (2021). Clase invertida, formación docente y agencia transformadora: un estudio preliminar en pandemia con estudiantes argentinos. Revista Jurídica De Investigación E Innovación Educativa (REJIE Nueva Época), 25, 67-85. https://doi.org/10.24310/REJIE.2021.vi25.13102
  38. Rigo, D., & Rovere, R. (2021). El compromiso académico estudiantil presente en una educación expandida por el uso de las TIC. Revista Andina De Educación, 4(2), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.32719/26312816.2021.4.2.6
  39. Rigo, D., Squillari, R., Caraballo, M., & Rovere, R. (2021). Revisión teórica del concepto agencia. Implicancias educativas para comprender el compromiso académico. Ciencia y Educación, 5(2), 81–92. https://doi.org/10.22206/cyed.2021.v5i2.pp81-92.
  40. Sannino, A. (2010). Teachers’ talk of experiencing: Conflict, resistance and agency. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(4), 838-844. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.021
  41. Schoon, I. (2018). Conceptualising Learner Agency: A Socio-Ecological Developmental Approach. Londres: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies. Disponible en https://www.llakes.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/LLAKES-Research-Paper-64-Schoon-I.pdf
  42. Simpson, A., Sang, G., Wood, J. Wang, Y. & Ye, B. (2018). A dialogue about teacher agency: Australian and Chinese perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 316-326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.07.002
  43. Soini, T., Pietarinen, J., & Pyhältö, K. (2016). What if teachers learn in the classroom? Teacher Development, 20(3), 380–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1149511
  44. Tao, J., & Gao, X. (2017). Teacher agency and identity commitment in curricular reform. Teaching and Teacher Education, 63, 346–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.010
  45. Tormey, R.& Wallen, M. (2019). Developing Teacher Agency through Dialogue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 82 (1), 129-139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.03.014
  46. Trilla, J. (1997). La educación y la ciudad. Revista Educación y Ciudad, 2, 6-19.
  47. Ukkonen-Mikkola, T., & Varpanen, J. (2020). Integrated initial and continuing training as a way of developing the professional agency of teachers and student teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 96, [103189]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2020.103189
  48. Ulla, M. B., & Perales, W. F. (2021). Facebook as an integrated online learning support application during the COVID19 pandemic: Thai university students’ experiences and perspectives. Heliyon, 7(11), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e08317
  49. Virkkunen, J. (2006). Dilemmas in Building Shared Transformative Agency. Activites Revue Electornique, 3, 43-66. https://doi.org/10.4000/activites.1850