Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): PURIQ (September-December)
Articles

Changing the theoretical centre in the ethics of justice: from humanity to life

María Teresa Ramírez Martínez
Autonomous University of Mexico State
Bio

Published 2021-09-11

Keywords

  • Ethics,
  • justice,
  • biodiversity,
  • anthropocentrism

How to Cite

Ramírez Martínez, M. T. (2021). Changing the theoretical centre in the ethics of justice: from humanity to life. Puriq, 3(4), 454–469. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.3.4.187

Métricas alternativas

Abstract

The subject of justice has had as its theoretical center human relations, this approach starts from an anthropocentric parameter, which has excluded from his study other forms of life. An analysis of the unequal and destructive consequences of this paradigm is presented. The objective is to contrast various philosophical models that address the importance of including non-human beings within the ethical study of justice, to conclude in a proposal that allows the inclusion of biodiversity. The theories of Cortina, Vandana Shiva, Naess, Gudynas, Singer and Nussbaum are taken up. Consequently, it is impossible to continue with anthropocentrism, the change to a theoretical model based on inclusive justice is proposed. The analysis and comparison of authors is used as a method to find convergences and divergences between them, which allows expanding the research to be able to contextualize each theoretical posture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Baquedano, S. (2016). Conversaciones con Peter Singer. Dilemata. 23, 229-245. http://dialnetuniroja .es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5836137
  2. Beorlegui, C. (2001). ¿Hacia un humanismo trans-antropocéntrico? Peter Singer y los ‘derechos’ de los animales. Realidad: Revista de Ciencias Sociales y Humanidades, 80, 199-236 http://dialnetuniroja .es/servlet/articulo?codigo=14615
  3. Burgos, J. (2008). Persona versus ser humano: un análisis del esquema argumentativo básico del debate. Cuadernos de bioética, 23, 433-447 https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=87511718003
  4. Bentham, J. (2008). Los principios de la moral y de la legislación. Claridad.
  5. Cortina, A. (2013). ¿Para qué sirve realmente…? La ética, Paidós.
  6. Costa, C. (2009). ¿Ética ecológica o medioambiental? Acta amazónica, 1, 113-120. http://doi.org/10.1590/S0044-596720009000100012
  7. De la Cuadra, A. (2013). Desarrollo, crisis ambiental y pueblos originarios en América Latina”, Espacio regional, Revista de Estudios Sociales, 10, 33-49 http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=4743371
  8. Gudynas, E. (2010). La senda biocéntrica: valores intrínsecos, derechos de la naturaleza y justicia ecológica. Tabula Rasa. 13, 45-71 http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=39617525003
  9. Ibarra, G. (2009), Ética del medio ambiente”, Elementos: Ciencia y cultura. 73, 11-17. http://redalyc.uaemex.mx/src/inicio/ArtPdfRed.jsp?iCve=29411996002
  10. Nussbaum, M. (2012). Las fronteras de la justicia. Consideraciones sobre la exclusión. Barcelona.
  11. Chagua, P., Malpartida, R., Torres, E., Echevarría, J., y Chuquilin, R. (2019). La seguridad alimentaria nutricional en el Perú, disponibilidad agroalimentaria. PURIQ, 1 (02), 10. https://doi.org/10.37073/puriq.1.02.33
  12. Rawls, J. (1995). Teoría de la justicia. Fondo de Cultura Económica.
  13. Vandana Shiva (2006). Manifiesto para una democracia de la tierra. Justicia. Paidós.